THE
CLEANTECH CRASH, SCANDAL UPDATES
Version
Update 9/1/2015.B
Let’s
check out the latest news in the notorious “Cleantech Crash” that
brought you Solyndra, corruption scandals and political ruckus. Here is
a quick overview of the latest findings.
What
were the attacks and abuses of office:
- Federal officials
specifically assigned contract, and funding application, reviews to
individuals known to already have political, financial and familial
incentives to see the Plaintiffs fail. These federal officials knew,
from the outset, that their associates would never pass anyone who
competed with their friends, and who was not on a pre-approved list
of “hard-wired” insiders. Most of these “reviewers” were,
themselves, competitors to Plaintiff, whose technology could have
put some of their companies out of business.
- What is the proof?:
- Financial, stock, employment, payment, asset, email and
meeting documents confirm this. Government and media investigations
provide additional proof.
===================
- Federal records show
that one of the Plaintiffs companies was in the #1 position to
receive funding in the federal program. When the friends of federal
officials discovered Plaintiffs lead position, and realized that
they were also technology competitors, they ordered Dept. of Energy
bosses to change the taken-in-order received rules so that
Plaintiffs were no longer in the lead. This was done because White
House and Department of Energy friends were the campaign financiers,
competing applicants, business competitors and pre-arranged awardees
- What is the proof?:
- Federal public records and DOE witnesses
===================
- Department of Energy
senior staff promised to provide a single one-sentence comment to
Plaintiffs investors in order for those investors to provide the
application fee, which the Department of Energy had required, from
one of Plaintiffs Companies. The Senior Department of Energy
official refused to provide the response until after the deadline
for application receipt had passed. At the moment that the deadline
had passed, the official, sent a time stamped email stating that it
was too late to apply because we had missed the deadline which he
had caused to be missed. This senior DOE staff member had
intentionally sabotaged the application by refusing to respond, per
his promise, to a huge number of emails, FedEx requests and phone
calls; even though his secretary said he was in the next room, each
time Plaintiffs attempted to follow-up. He was an associate of
Plaintiffs competitors and ran part of the Department of Energy
- What is the proof?:
- Time stamped communications, Department of energy records
and law enforcement surveillance.
====================
- One of Plaintiffs
Companies wrote a letter of complaint to Senator Bingaman and the
Senate Committee that oversees the Department of Energy. Senator
Bingaman forwarded the letter to Steven Chu, for his comment on the
issue. Steven Chu wrote a letter back in which Chu specifically
refused to comment on the issue.
- What is the proof?:
- Library of Congress and Federal document records
====================
- Steven Chu only awarded
federal funds to his friends, who also were campaign financiers and
business competitors of Plaintiffs companies.
- What is the proof?:
- Federal records, email, stock market records, emails,
investigative documents, surveillance.
====================
- White House staff had
pre-coordinated with Steven Chu, and the few awardees who actually
received the funding, in advance of the beginning of the funding
program, in order arrange quid-pro-quo kickback arrangements, while,
at the same time, damaging their competition.
- What is the proof?:
- Public records, news reports, stock evidence, PAC
reports, family trust records, financial records, corporate records,
ownership documents, and surveillance.
====================
- Federal officials
solicited independent applicants such as ZAP, Bright Automotive,
Aptera, XPV and many others, to use them as cover stories in order
to make the program look like it had not been rigged, in advance,
when, in fact, it had been. Every applicant who was not on the
pre-rigged insider list, and competed with those who were, was
terminated by the actions of federal officials
- What is the proof?:
- Retrospective records and federal documents prove that no
independent company, who was not friends with, and financiers for, DOE
and White House campaigns, was rejected. Emails, witnesses, financial
documents, waterfall charts, surveillance, restaurant videos of
meetings, and testimony records.
===================
- White House and DOE
officials ordered, coordinated, managed and supported media and
economic financial assassination and character assassination attacks
on applicants who reported misdeeds. They used their contractors:
In-Q-Tel, New America Foundation, Think Progress, Gawker Media and
certain other, specific, hired writers, and operatives to engage in
this revenge and retribution attacks.
- What is the proof?:
- The vast and clearly visible publicly published news
coverage clearly proves that the attacks did happen. Numerous other
citizens have recently filed lawsuits against federal officials
proving that they were subjected to the same attacks by the same
Administration. All of the above-mentioned attack contractors have
been financially, politically, familiarly, asset, communications and
activity traced back the same federal officials and their friends, who
also happen to be the same friends who are the only ones to receive
the cash from the funding programs and who also, coincidentally,
happen to be competitors of the Plaintiffs; while, also
coincidentally, being the campaign financiers of this Administration.
Additionally, the particular scope, distribution and timing of the
attacks specifically times out to be synchronous to the complaints
filed by the Plaintiffs. All Plaintiffs had glowing reference and top
standings until the attacks, for decades prior, proving the attack
period to be an anomaly. Web published exhortations by the attackers
show that they, exclusively, financed, managed and controlled the
attacking contractors. IP and DNS server records.
===================
- Federal officials
control the search results of Google, for political purposes, and
used Google’s monopolistic control of internet news and media to
attack the Plaintiffs because they were competitors and because they
reported the misdeeds of those federal officials and cooperated with
federal investigators who were looking into their crimes.
- What is the proof?:
- EU investigations have proven that Google rigs its search
engine via manual manipulation. Kliener Perkins created Google,
received some of the largest cash kickbacks from DOE and White House
sources, funded The White House and West Coast Senators campaigns and
can be financially, stock market, communications and witness-traced as
the controlling party in most Google political search manipulations.
Additionally, multiple research institutes, as well as Plaintiffs own
private investigators, have revealed that they had placed thousands of
internet servers across the internet to document and records Google’s
malicious search engine manipulations, and political attacks, ever
since 2009. Complete technical evidence now exists to prove that
Google, specifically manipulated its search results, at the request of
federal officials, in order to attack the Plaintiffs in revenge for
helping investigators and to seek to minimize their credibility if a
Special Prosecutor should ever be appointed.
====================
- Eric Holder and Steven
Chu were placed in office with orders to protect the Department of
Energy and TARP kickback scheme from discovery.
- What is the proof?:
- The law firm of Covington and Burling lobbied to place
both of them in office under the direction and payroll of the very
same people who were Steven Chu’s friends and recipients of the DOE
cash. Public records, family trust disclosures, emails, former
Covington and Burling staff, surveillance and federal investigation
files. Both are shown to have had personal, business and stock
relationships with all of the financiers and their companies, before,
during, and after their federal office roles.
===================
- Lachlan Seward, Steven
Chu’s cash administrator at the Department of Energy, ordered
federal record shredded and told his staff to ignore, and/or
manipulate the records of the applicants who were not friends of
Steven Chu.
- What is the proof?:
- Previous, and later, documents for Tesla Motors show
differences in the documents. DOE staff engaged in shredding order by
Seward. DOE Maintenance records. DOE cameras. Emails. Missing evidence
requested by Committees.
===================
- Steven Chu waived Tesla
Motors application fees on request of White House operatives.
- What is the proof?:
- Tesla staff have been recorded confirming this. U.S.
Treasury and OBM staff have, additionally, confirmed this.
===================
- Elon Musk, at the time
one of the richest men in America, has needed to receive tens of
billions of dollars of taxpayer hand-outs as a kickback for him, and
his friends, for funding Obama’s and Dianne Feinstein’s political
efforts. He got his State & federal cash as part of a kick-back
scheme
- What is the proof?:
- For the Feinstein proof. Emails, surveillance, public
records and witness testimony proves that the Feinstein family did
lobby to put Solyndra and Tesla on the same plot of land that they
controlled in Fremont, California. The real estate records, family
trust documents, tax documents, emails, Fremont council meetings with
Feinstein staff, Feinstein control of Newman Search HR for Tesla and
Solyndra, Feinstein sharing of staff with Tesla/Solyndra, Feinstein
inside stock trading, Feinstein adjacent property ownership, Feinstein
construction company ownership, Feinstein leasing and contract rights
ownerships, and related documents, Documents from Toyota, prove that
the Feinstein’s got Solyndra and Tesla funded in exchange. For insider
trading and cash kickbacks. Additionally, emails, phone records and
surveillance show that Feinstein staff
threatened some of the Plaintiffs and engaged in sabotage
against their business efforts which competed with Tesla and Solyndra.
Steven Chu and Elon Musk are personal friends and associates of the
Feinstein family. The evidence and proof of the
Feinstein/Tesla/Solyndra collusion is quite substantial. For the
evidence of the White House/Musk collusion connects to both Musk and
John Doerr’s company: Kliener Perkins: Emails, family trusts, HSBC
leaks, witnesses, other related lawsuit evidence, Goldman Sachs
surveillance recordings, stock ownership and transaction records, and
federal criminal investigation files provide ample proof.
Additionally, simple math also provides verification. There is no
record, in recorded history, of such a wealthy man receiving so many
government handouts, in such sizes, with such minimal results, unless
there was an organized crime scheme underway. Additional evidence and
leak documents also verify these charges.
==========================
- The Plaintiffs had the
best, most attractive debt-ratio standing of all applicants. Tesla
had the worst debt-ratio standing, of all the applicants, yet Tesla
received the award even though the federal section 136 law said that
debt-ratio status was the key determination component.
- What is the proof?:
- Elon Musk has been recorded in news articles, network TV
and in his own emails testifying to the fact that, at the time of his
application to DOE, Tesla was about to go bankrupt and he was
preparing “Golden Parachute” massive payout packages for the end of
Tesla. Tesla’s own financial records and documents filed with Welles
Fargo Bank prove that Tesla was mired in debt, had no demand for its
product, and should file bankruptcy. In spite of these facts, Tesla,
in violation of the Section 136 law, was awarded federal taxpayer cash
when they had no hope of surviving without that cash. This was
illegal. Federal criminal investigation records by multiple agencies
and committees further prove this fact.
=========================
- White House and Federal
Reserve Bank staff help keep Tesla afloat by shifting stock market
metrics, stock pumps with buyback incentives and other special
resources in order to do anything to keep Tesla from bankruptcy and
investigation like its next-door twin: Solyndra.
- What is the proof?:
- When Solyndra died and was FBI raided, Presidential
candidate Mitt Romney was recorded saying “Tesla and Solyndra were
Losers”. This is published widely in news broadcasts and publications. White House press staff
became so fearful that the Steven Chu campaign finance kickback scheme
would go public that they organized one of the biggest character
assassination campaigns, ever created, against Romney, using the
Google politics engine. Romney is recorded and documented, in many
news broadcasts describing this character assassination attack on him
by White House operatives. The ultimate crash of Tesla will vindicate
the deeply White House hated Romney, provide steam to competing
campaigns, and expose the whole kickback scheme. White House
operatives have been shown to stop at nothing to keep Tesla alive in
the media in order to avoid lethal embarrassment. While Tesla has had
a record number of deaths, fires, crashes, drunk driving incidents,
toxic vapors, divorces, fraud lawsuits and low demand; all of those
downsides are covered up by Google and White House controlled media as
proven in 5 years of side by side news story comparisons of actual
news in non-controlled outlets vs. manipulated news in White House
campaign financier controlled outlets such as Google.
==========================
- Federal officials had
their contractors call Plaintiffs employers and get them fired, in
revenge.
- What is the proof?:
- Phone records, federal surveillance, HR services.
=========================
- Gary D. Conley, Rajeev
Motwani, David Bird, Karl Slym, Ravi Kumar, and many other,
mysteriously deceased, persons had personal competitive,
investigative or business interactions with the Defendants?
- What is the proof?:
- YouTube videos, family members, their own boogs,
published communications, emails.
==========================
- Federal officials asked
applicants to work on federal projects which involved toxic and
lethal materials which Plaintiffs were exposed to working with the
U.S. Department of Energy program. When Plaintiffs filed for federal
offsets for their poisoning by toxic materials, their disability
claims were stalled, manipulated and denied.
- What is the proof?:
- MSDS records, federal contracts and NDA’s, surveillance
and security office records, nuclear secrets agreement documents
filings, federal records, emails, phone communications, federal
hearing records.
=========================
- Federal officials
ordered their contractors to manipulate job hiring databases so that
Plaintiffs who had reported mis-deeds would get “red flagged” when
recruiters or employers tried to hire them; thus terminating any
hopes they had for getting future employment.
- What is the proof?:
- Klayman lawsuit records, Judicial Watch NSA lawsuit
filings, database research, sting investigation, HR test via private
investigators, Comparative analysis metrics.
================================
- Part of Steven Chu's
scam involved manipulating mining commodities with Goldman Sachs and
Kleiner Perkins, using taxpayer money.
- What is the proof?:
- The Frank Guistra disclosures, evidence in the Raj Gupta
arrest, Steven Ratner’s indictment file, HSBC leak documents,
origination records for the published articles entitled: "Afghanistan
is the Saudi Arabia of Lithium" and "Trillions of dollars of lithium
in Afghanistan". FBI records from the Solyndra raid. U.S. Senate
investigation files from the Goldman Sachs metals commodity
manipulation investigations. Stock ownership disclosures, family trust
ownership documents, Cayman Islands banking disclosures, PAC forensic
examination files, real estate and shipping ownership records,
supplier contracts from Solyndra, Tesla Motors, A123 and related
commodity exploiters, surveillance records, witness testimony, DOJ
records and investigations, U.S. Treasury records and investigations.
Goldman Sachs skimming of stock profits on almost every Steven Chu
funded federal deal.
There
are over 200 additional
misdeeds and proof overviews… stay tuned.
Records,
evidence and material provide by, and shared with: Law enforcement
agencies, news bureaus, news aggregation sites, consumer rights
organizations, taxpayer organizations, Grand Jury offices, subscribed
voters and related entities.
Security Note: To protect
Plaintiffs, All of the data exists in globally published, disguised,
encrypted “Drawstring” torrents which can be released on a moment’s notice
by multiple parties